Skip to content
← Back to blog

Why We Build Every App with Flutter

How choosing Flutter as our cross-platform framework lets us ship on Android, iOS, and macOS from a single codebase — and why we picked it over native development and React Native.

The Single-Codebase Promise

When we founded Axis Labs, one of the first engineering decisions we faced was this: should we write separate native codebases for Android and iOS, adopt React Native, or go all-in on Flutter? After prototyping in all three, the answer became obvious. Flutter gave us a single Dart codebase that compiles to truly native ARM binaries, pixel-perfect rendering via its own Skia/Impeller engine, and a development loop so fast that hot reload felt like editing a live document.

Today, every app in our catalog — DriveCam, My Rents, AI Sabotage, HomeHandy, Tandapp, The Impostor, Party Words, MyHoldings, TimeTap, Mind your Math, Horas Extras, and Lucra — ships from one repo per product. That is multiple apps live on Google Play, all available on the App Store, and several also running natively on macOS. One team, one language, multiple products.

Flutter vs. Native Development

Native development with Kotlin for Android and Swift for iOS is still the gold standard for maximum platform integration. But maintaining two codebases means double the bugs, double the QA cycles, and — most critically for a small studio — double the time-to-market. We estimated that going native-only would have cut our catalog in half. Features like the dual-camera recording in DriveCam or the real-time landlord dashboard in My Rents would have taken months longer to ship and keep in parity across platforms.

Flutter bridges the gap. Its platform channel system lets us call native APIs when we need them — camera hardware, in-app purchases, background services — while keeping 95% of the code shared. We still write native code when it makes sense, but only once, wrapped in a clean Dart interface that both platforms consume.

Flutter vs. React Native

React Native was the other serious contender. Its JavaScript ecosystem is massive, and the React component model is battle-tested. But after building test projects in both, three factors tipped the scale toward Flutter. First, performance: Flutter compiles to native code without a JavaScript bridge, which means smoother animations, faster startup, and no jank from async bridge serialization. DriveCam records video at while simultaneously streaming a GPS overlay — that kind of workload exposes bridge overhead immediately.

Second, UI consistency: Flutter draws every pixel itself, so a widget looks and behaves identically on a Pixel 9 and an iPhone 16. React Native delegates rendering to platform components, which can diverge in subtle but frustrating ways. Third, Dart: it is a strongly-typed, AOT-compiled language with excellent null safety, pattern matching, and tooling. For a studio building apps, type safety catches bugs before they reach users.

Desktop and Beyond

One of Flutter's underrated strengths is its desktop story. Several of our apps — including productivity tools like TimeTap and financial trackers like MyHoldings — also run natively on macOS. The same adaptive layouts and responsive design patterns that make them work on phones and tablets scale up to laptop screens. No Electron wrapper, no web-view bridge — just compiled Dart running directly on Apple Silicon.

This is the future we are investing in: write once, deploy everywhere that matters. Flutter lets a small, focused studio compete with teams ten times our size. We pick the right tool for the job, and for cross-platform mobile products, Flutter is that tool.